ov B.A. Proishozhdenie chuvash po dannym
yazyka // O proishozhdenii chuvashskogo naroda.
CHeboksary, 1957. S. 41.</p>

<p><a name="Article21note40"></a><a HREF="#Article21text40">[40]</a> Hajdu P. Or. cit.
S. 88 - 89; Archaeologica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae. 1961. N13. P. 309-319.</p>

<p><a name="Article21note41"></a><a HREF="#Article21text41">[41]</a>
SHnitnikovA.V. Izmenchivost' obshchej uvlazhnennosti
materikov severnogo polushariya // Zapiski VGO. 1957.
T. XVI. S. 269.</p>

<p><a name="Article21note42"></a><a HREF="#Article21text42">[42]</a> Berg L. S.
Beseda so studentami Moskovskogo universiteta //
Voprosy geografii, 1951. S. 68-69.</p>

<p><a name="Article21note43"></a><a HREF="#Article21text43">[43]</a> Altheim F., Steil V.
Die Araber in der Alten Welt. Bd. V. Teil 2. Bri., 1969. S. 507-525.</p>

<p><a name="Article21note44"></a><a HREF="#Article21text44">[44]</a> Bichurin N.YA.
(Iakinf). Uk. soch. T. II. S. 249; T. III. S. 19.</p>

<p><a name="Article21note45"></a><a HREF="#Article21text45">[45]</a> Bichurin N.YA.
Sobranie svedenij po istoricheskoj geografii
Vostochnoj Sibiri. CHeboksary, 1960. S. 365.</p>

<p><a name="Article21note46"></a><a HREF="#Article21text46">[46]</a> Tam zhe S.
557-562.</p>

<p><a name="Article21note47"></a><a HREF="#Article21text47">[47]</a> Ammian
Marcellin. Uk. soch. S. 188-191.</p>

<p><a name="Article21note48"></a><a HREF="#Article21text48">[48]</a> Hannestad K. Les
relations de Byzance avec la Transcaucausie et l'Asie Centrale au V et VI siecles //
Byzantion. Bruxelles, 1957. T. XXV-XXVI-XXVII. P. 450.</p>

<p><a name="Article21note49"></a><a HREF="#Article21text49">[49]</a> Ibid. P. 429.</p>

<p><a name="Article21note50"></a><a HREF="#Article21text50">[50]</a> Podrobnee
sm.: Gumilev L.N. Kolebaniya stepeni uvlazhneniya i
migracii narodov v yugo-vostochnoj Evrope s II po IV
v.// Actes du Vile Congres International des Sciences Prehistoriques. Prague, 1971. P.
951-955.</p>

<p><a name="Article21note51"></a><a HREF="#Article21text51">[51]</a> Robertson
Dzh.S. Istoriya hristianskoj cerkvi. T. 1. SPb., 1890. S.
133.</p>

<p><a name="Article21note52"></a><a HREF="#Article21text52">[52]</a> Tam zhe. S. 170.</p>

<p><a name="Article21note53"></a><a HREF="#Article21text53">[53]</a>
Kosmicheskaya antropoekologiya: tehnika i metody
issledovanij // Gumilev L.N., Ivanov K.K. |tnosfera
i kosmos, L., 1984. S. 211.</p>

<p><a name="Article21note54"></a><a HREF="#Article21text54">[54]</a> Sm.: Veber G.
Vseobshchaya istoriya. T. IV. M., 1893. S. 447-451.</p>

<p><a name="Article21note55"></a><a HREF="#Article21text55">[55]</a> Artamonov
M.I. Spornye voprosy drevnejshej istorii slavyan i
Rusi // Kratkie soobshcheniya Instituta istorii
material'noj kul'tury (KSIIMK). 1940. Vyp. VI. S. 5.</p>

<p><a name="Article21note56"></a><a HREF="#Article21text56">[56]</a> Rybakov B.A.
Drevnie rusy // Sovetskaya arheologiya. 1953. T. XVII. S.
23-104; Skrzhinskaya E.CH. Kommentarii. V kn.: Iordan. O
proishozhdenii i deyaniyah gotov. M., 1960. S. 279.</p>

<p><a name="Article21note57"></a><a HREF="#Article21text57">[57]</a> &quot;Polyane,
yazhe nyne rekomaya Rus'&quot; (Povest' vremennyh let).</p>

<p><a name="Article21note58"></a><a HREF="#Article21text58">[58]</a> Skrzhinskaya
E. CH. Uk. soch. S. 274-279.</p>

<p><a name="Article21note59"></a><a HREF="#Article21text59">[59]</a> Bichurin N.YA.
(Iakinf). Sobranie svedenij o narodah, obitavshih v
Srednej Azii v drevnie vremena. V 3-h t. T. II. M.; L.,
1950. S. 229.</p>

<p><a name="Article21note60"></a><a HREF="#Article21text60">[60]</a> Iz kratkogo
upominaniya o deyaniyah imperatora Tacita (275-276 gg.)
vidno, chto alany byli v soyuze s gotami (sm.: Veber
G. Uk. soch. T. IV. S. 515).</p>

<p><a name="Article21note61"></a><a HREF="#Article21text61">[61]</a> Media
Atropatena - nyne Azerbajdzhan.</p>

<p><a name="Article21note62"></a><a HREF="#Article21text62">[62]</a> Skrzhinskaya
E.CH. Uk. soch. S. 270.</p>

<p><a name="Article21note63"></a><a HREF="#Article21text63">[63]</a> Veber G. Uk.
soch. S. 593.</p>

<p><a name="Article21note64"></a><a HREF="#Article21text64">[64]</a> Vizigoty i
gepidy - zapadnye vetvi gotov; yazigi - sarmatskoe
plemya v Pannonii.</p>

<p><a name="Article21note65"></a><a HREF="#Article21text65">[65]</a> Drugaya
chast' vandalov, sdavshayasya rimlyanam, byla
poselena v Britanii v 277 g. (sm.: Veber G. Uk. soch. S.
517).</p>

<p><a name="Article21note66"></a><a HREF="#Article21text66">[66]</a> Tajfaly -
germanskoe plemya, zhivshee v IV v. na Serete,
soyuzniki gotov, no drugogo proishozhdeniya; karpy -
plemya na Nizhnem Dunae, Prute i Serete,
po-vidimomu, dakijskoe, voevavshee v III v. s
rimlyanami, buduchi v soyuze s ostrogotami; geruly -
&quot;skifskoe&quot; (to est' germanskoe) plemya, zhivshee
u Azovskogo morya, pokorennoe Germanarihom
(Skrzhinskaya E.CH. Uk. soch. S. 251-254, 279).</p>

<p><a name="Article21note67"></a><a HREF="#Article21text67">[67]</a> Severnye,
to est' pribaltijskie slavyane; yuzhnye nazyvalis'
sklavinami.</p>

<p><a name="Article21note68"></a><a HREF="#Article21text68">[68]</a> |ti
svedeniya Iordana vyzyvayut somneniya u Skrzhinskoj
(s. 268). Odnako esli schitat', chto venedy i ajstii, to
est' slavyane i balty (litovcy), nahodilis' na
granice vladenij Germanariha i podchinenie ih
bylo formal'nym, kak eto chasto byvalo v Srednie
veka, to ochertaniya ego derzhavy v predstavleniyah
drevnih i novyh avtorov rashodyatsya tol'ko v
detalyah, to est' v predelah dopuska.</p>

<p><a name="Article21note69"></a><a HREF="#Article21text69">[69]</a> Malov S.E.
Enisejskaya pis'mennost' tyurkov. M.; L., 1952. S. 88.</p>

<p><a name="Article21note70"></a><a HREF="#Article21text70">[70]</a> Tam zhe. S.
85-90.</p>

<p><a name="Article21note71"></a><a HREF="#Article21text71">[71]</a> Bolchu - nyne
r. Urungu v Dzhungarii.</p>

<p><a name="Article21note72"></a><a HREF="#Article21text72">[72]</a> Malov S.E.
Uk. soch. S. 88.</p>

<p><a name="Article21note73"></a><a HREF="#Article21text73">[73]</a> Iordan. Uk.
soch. S. 91.</p>

<p><a name="Article21note74"></a><a HREF="#Article21text74">[74]</a> Tam zhe. S. 91.</p>

<p><a name="Article21note75"></a><a HREF="#Article21text75">[75]</a> Rybakov B.A.
Uk. soch.</p>

<p><a name="Article21note76"></a><a HREF="#Article21text76">[76]</a> &quot;Po tu
storonu Meotidy&quot; (Ammian Marcellin. XXXI, 2, 1).</p>

<p><a name="Article21note77"></a><a HREF="#Article21text77">[77]</a> Srednij Don
okajmlyayut tri terrasy. Na nizhnej - pribrezhnyj les
(tu-gaj), na srednej - step' s kolkami (roshchami) -
prekrasnym ukrytiem dlya mestnyh zhitelej i ih
otryadov. Donskie kazaki zashchishchalis' zdes' ot
nogajcev vplot' po XVIII vek. CHtoby razbit' kazakov,
nogajcam nuzhen byl bol'shoj chislennyj pereves.
&quot;Beschislennye polchishcha gunnov&quot; - plod
fantazii evropejskih istorikov. Gunny v vojne s
alanami kormilis' ohotoj i, sledovatel'no, mogli
peredvigat'sya tol'ko malymi otryadami, sovmeshchaya
ohotu s vojnoj. Da i bylo ih do 370 g. ochen' malo.
Polozhenie izmenilos' potom.</p>

<p><a name="Article21note78"></a><a HREF="#Article21text78">[78]</a> Istochnik
Iordana, Ablavij, otnosit erulov k &quot;skifam&quot;.
Istoriyu voprosa sm.: Skrzhinskaya E. CH. Uk. soch. S. 89,
266-267; otozhdestvlenie etnonimov &quot;erul - gerul&quot;
- nasha gipoteza.</p>

<p><a name="Article21note79"></a><a HREF="#Article21text79">[79]</a> Iordan Uk.
soch. S. 90-91.</p>

<p><a name="Article21note80"></a><a HREF="#Article21text80">[80]</a> E.CH.
Skrzhinskaya, kommentiruya &quot;legendu ob olene&quot;,
solidarizuetsya skoree so skeptikami, nezheli s
Iordanom i Zosimom, avtorom vtoroj poloviny V
veka. Iordan pripisyvaet tragicheskij dlya gotov
perehod gunnov cherez morya zlym duham - predkam
gunnov, a Zosim pishet: &quot;YA nashel i takoe
izvestie, chto Kimmerijskij Bospor, obmelevshij ot
snesennogo Tanaisom ila, pozvolil im (gunnam)
perejti peshkom iz Azii v Evropu&quot; (Skrzhinskaya
E.CH. Uk. soch. S. 271). Vidimo, tak ono i bylo. Izmenenie
puti ciklonov iz Zapolyar'ya v step' v IV v. dolzhno
bylo vyzvat' burnuyu gumidizaciyu lesnoj zony, gde
berut nachalo Volga, Don i Dnepr. Pri polovod'yah
eti reki snesli v ust'ya razmytuyu pochvu i sozdali
na Volge del'tu, v nizov'yah Dona - bar, kotoryj
vposledstvii byl razmyt volneniem Azovskogo
morya i posluzhil materialom dlya otmelej v
Kerchenskom prolive.</p>

<p><a name="Article21note81"></a><a HREF="#Article21text81">[81]</a> Izvestiya
drevnih pisatelej o Skifii i Kavkaze. T. 1.
Grecheskie pisateli. SPb., 1893. S. 726.</p>

<p><a name="Article21note82"></a><a HREF="#Article21text82">[82]</a> Artamonov
M.I. Istoriya hazar. L., 1962. S. 46-51.</p>

<p><a name="Article21note83"></a><a HREF="#Article21text83">[83]</a> Mommzen T.
Istoriya Rima. T. V. M., 1949. S. 272.</p>

<p><a name="Article21note84"></a><a HREF="#Article21text84">[84]</a> Tam zhe. S. 211.</p>

<p><a name="Article21note85"></a><a HREF="#Article21text85">[85]</a> Eshche v 336 g.
Bospor prinadlezhal rimlyanam, no vskore Rim
perestal zabotit'sya o sud'be grekov, zhivshih v
Krymu (sm.: Tam zhe. S. 268).</p>

<p><a name="Article21note86"></a><a HREF="#Article21text86">[86]</a> Oba byli
predatel'ski ubity po prikazu imperatorov.</p>

<p><a name="Article21note87"></a><a HREF="#Article21text87">[87]</a> Veber G. Uk.
soch. S. 593.</p>

<p><a name="Article21note88"></a><a HREF="#Article21text88">[88]</a> Iordan. Uk.
soch. S. 91-92.</p>

<p><a name="Article21note89"></a><a HREF="#Article21text89">[89]</a> &quot;Hotya
teper' (v VI v. <em>- L.G.</em>) oni svirepstvuyut
povsemestno&quot;, - otmechaet Iordan, imeya v vidu
venetov (tam zhe. S. 90). Vot granica passionarnogo
tolchka. Venety, a potom saksy i franki poluchili
passionarnost' ot geneticheskogo drejfa i, otstav
na starte, vyigrali na finishe.</p>

<p><a name="Article21note90"></a><a HREF="#Article21text90">[90]</a> Sm.:
Skrzhinskaya E.CH. Uk. soch. S. 221.</p>

<p><a name="Article21note91"></a><a HREF="#Article21text91">[91]</a> Valent byl
revnostnym arianinom.</p>

<p><a name="Article21note92"></a><a HREF="#Article21text92">[92]</a> Iordan. Uk.
soch. S. 115.</p>

<p><a name="Article21note93"></a><a HREF="#Article21text93">[93]</a> Skrzhinskaya
E. CH. Uk. soch. S. 320.</p>

<p><a name="Article21note94"></a><a HREF="#Article21text94">[94]</a> Tam zhe. S.
206-208.</p>

<p><a name="Article21note95"></a><a HREF="#Article21text95">[95]</a> Pozhaluj,
tol'ko eto i bessporno v antskoj probleme. Vse
drugie suzhdeniya istorikov ob antah reshitel'no
rashodyatsya. YA soglasen s temi, kto schitaet antov
slavyanami i predkami polyan.</p>

<p><a name="Article21note96"></a><a HREF="#Article21text96">[96]</a> Iordan. Uk.
soch. S. 92.</p>

<p><a name="Article21note97"></a><a HREF="#Article21text97">[97]</a> Tam zhe. S. 301.</p>

<p><a name="Article21note98"></a><a HREF="#Article21text98">[98]</a> Veber G. Uk.
soch. S. 310.</p>

<p><a name="Article21note99"></a><a HREF="#Article21text99">[99]</a> Destunis
G.S. Skazaniya Priska Panijskogo. SPb., 1861. S. 55-58.</p>

<p><a name="Article21note100"></a><a HREF="#Article21text100">[100]</a> Zapadnaya
Rimskaya imperiya; eto ee nazvanie zabylos' k VI
veku.</p>

<p><a name="Article21note101"></a><a HREF="#Article21text101">[101]</a> Tak zhe on
nazval i Aeciya, no tut s nim nel'zya soglasit'sya.
Po harakteru, strastnosti, otsutstviyu
patriotizma i avantyurizma Aecij bol'she rannij
vizantiec, chem pozdnij rimlyanin. I rodyatsya on na
beregah Nizhnego Dunaya, a ne Tibra ili Po. Ni on ne
lyubil italikov, ni oni ego.</p>

<p><a name="Article21note102"></a><a HREF="#Article21text102">[102]</a>
Skrzhinskaya E. CH. Uk. soch. S. 302.</p>

<p><a name="Article21note103"></a><a HREF="#Article21text103">[103]</a> Artamonov
M.I. Uk. soch. S. 56, prim.</p>

<p><a name="Article21note104"></a><a HREF="#Article21text104">[104]</a> Tam zhe. S.
55.</p>

<p><a name="Article21note105"></a><a HREF="#Article21text105">[105]</a> Veber G.
Uk. soch. S. 670.</p>

<p><a name="Article21note106"></a><a HREF="#Article21text106">[106]</a> Evropeus
D. Ob ugorskom narode, obitavshem v srednej i
severnoj Rossii do pribytiya tuda slavyan. SPb., 1874.
S. 3.</p>

<p><a name="Article21note107"></a><a HREF="#Article21text107">[107]</a>
Skrzhinskaya E.CH. Uk. soch. S. 307.</p>

<p><a name="Article21note108"></a><a HREF="#Article21text108">[108]</a> Iordan.
Uk. soch. S. 118.</p>

<p><a name="Article21note109"></a><a HREF="#Article21text109">[109]</a>
Skrzhinskaya E. CH. Uk. soch. S. 341.</p>

<p><a name="Article21note110"></a><a HREF="#Article21text110">[110]</a> Destunis
G.S. Uk. soch. S. 87.</p>

<p><a name="Article21note111"></a><a HREF="#Article21text111">[111]</a> Gumilev
L.N. Tri ischeznuvshih naroda // Strany i narody
Vostoka. Vyp. II. M., 1961. S. 106-109.</p>

<p><a name="Article21note112"></a><a HREF="#Article21text112">[112]</a> Sm.:
Artamonov M.I. Istoriya hazar. S. 69-78.</p>

<p><a name="Article21note113"></a><a HREF="#Article21text113">[113]</a> Bichurin
N.YA. Sobranie svedenij po istoricheskoj geografii
Vostochnoj i Seredinnoj Azii. CHeboksary, 1960. S. 542,
549, 553.</p>

<p><a name="Article21note114"></a><a HREF="#Article21text114">[114]</a> Gumilev
L.N. Istoki ritma kochevoj kul'tury Sredinnoj Azii
(Opyt istoriko-geograficheskogo sinteza) // Narody
Azii i Afriki. 1966. No 4.</p>

<p><a name="Article21note115"></a><a HREF="#Article21text115">[115]</a> Artamonov
M.I. Uk. soch. S. 60-78.</p>

<p><a name="Article21note116"></a><a HREF="#Article21text116">[116]</a> SHevchenko
YU.YU. Na rubezhe dvuh etnicheskih substratov
Vostochnoj Evropy. L., 1977. S. 39-58.</p>

<p><a name="Article21note117"></a><a HREF="#Article21text117">[117]</a> Gumilev
L.N. Otkrytie Hazarii. M., 1966. S. 63-64.</p>

<p><a name="Article21note118"></a><a HREF="#Article21text118">[118]</a>
Skrzhinskaya E. CH. Uk. soch. S. 340.</p>

<p><a name="Article21note119"></a><a HREF="#Article21text119">[119]</a> Tam zhe. S.
333.</p>

<p><a name="Article21note120"></a><a HREF="#Article21text120">[120]</a>
Arianstvo, prinyatoe gotami sluchajno - pri ih
dvore s imperatorom Valentom v 376 g., zatem stalo
simvolom etnicheskogo samoutverzhdeniya vostochnyh
germanskih plemen, znamenem,
protivopostavlennym pravoslaviyu, kotoromu
pokrovitel'stvoval vrag gotov - imperator
Feodosij I. Konechno, dogmaticheskie raznoglasiya
byli neponyatny bezgramotnym gotam. No lyudi v
kriticheskih fazah etnogeneza dumayut ne ob etom, a
o tom, gde svoi, a gde vragi. Pri etnicheskih
kontaktah ispovedanie tol'ko indikator svyazi,
polozhitel'noj ili otricatel'noj.</p>

<p><a name="Article21note121"></a><a HREF="#Article21text121">[121]</a> Iordan.
Uk. soch. S. 120; Skrzhinskaya E.CH. Uk. soch. S. 336.</p>